How could it happen that after Stalin came to power in the country namely Khrushchev? It seems that Stalin did everything to “cleanse” the party of any of his opponents, real and imaginary, “Right” and “Left”. In 50-ies passed from mouth to mouth supposedly one of his aphoristic phrases: “There is a man-there is a problem, no man, no problem.” As a result, remained alive, it would seem, the most loyal, the most reliable. How did Stalin, Khrushchev did not see a grave-digger of his cult? (more…)
Archive for June, 2009
Why Khrushchev came to power?
Thursday, June 18th, 2009Country longed for change
Sunday, June 14th, 2009After the hardest of the war, after the Stalinist dictatorship country yearned for change. Grain yields were approximately eight tons per hectare. Industry require technical upgrading. People are in desperate need of shelter, food, consumer goods. The farther into the past departed enthusiasm of victory, so vividly showed through simple, everyday, on all issues. (more…)
XX Congress of the CPSU.
Saturday, June 13th, 2009Notice of the convening of the next XX Congress of the CPSU appeared in print in July 1955. Congress had to approve the guidelines for the sixth Five-Year Plan, as well as hear the report of the Central Committee of the CPSU. It was expected that the Report of the Central Committee will be briefly touched upon the question of the “cult of personality”, which is increasingly worried public. (more…)
Aksiutchits strongly condemned
Thursday, June 11th, 2009 hours after the report, Aksiutchits strongly condemned” Byelovezhsky conspiracy. ”
April 19, 1991 at the initiative of Aksyuchits RHDD, Democratic Party of Russia (DPR) and the Constitutional Democratic Party (People’s Freedom Party) entered the “Constitutional and Democratic Bloc” People’s consent. “Entered in block organizations supported the Union Treaty in its” novoogarevskom ” as opposed to Chisinau Moldova’s actions (more…)
Thus, in the heart of Europe
Thursday, June 11th, 2009Thus, in the heart of Europe has developed the most dangerous hotbed of future war.
At this time, the political circles in Britain, the USA, France pursued a policy of promoting Germany, trying to send her aggression against the Soviet Union. This policy was carried out both on the world stage and within States. For example, almost all countries waged a campaign against the Soviet Union, actively promoted the idea of “growing Soviet threat”, the idea of “Russian military preparations.” In foreign policy, British and French leaders, as evidenced by documents, solved the problem, as if to ward off the threat Germanskoy aggression and defuse the energy of Nazism and the expansion to the East. (more…)